202-640-3023 cmr@correctmilitaryrecords.com Correct Military Records and Back Pay
202-640-3023 cmr@correctmilitaryrecords.com Correct Military Records and Back Pay
Service members and cadets who test positive for drugs / are involved in drug-related incidents may expect the following:
1 disciplinary action – either Article 15 UCMJ punishment, letter of reprimand, or court-martial
2 employment action – adverse evaluation, initiation of separation, separation
3 security clearance – potential security clearance issues, losing security clearance
4 promotion – delays of promotion or non-selection
5 loss of command – relief for cause or detachment for cause
6 being flagged / put in legal hold
7 command directed mental health evaluation
8 potential other consequences: loss of assignment, recoupment, other
There are different types of Article 112a violations. The government is responsible for providing all elements. Yes, you can fight it. It is possible to successfully defend against a positive drug test but it is important to act quickly and have an experienced attorney on your side.
ELEMENTS:
(1) That the accused possessed a certain amount of
a controlled substance; and
(2) That the possession by the accused was wrongful.
ELEMENTS:
(1) That the accused used a controlled substance;
and
(2) That the use by the accused was wrongful.
ELEMENTS:
(a) That the accused distributed a certain amount of a controlled substance; and
(b) That the distribution by the accused was wrongful.
means amphetamine, cocaine, heroin, lysergic acid
diethylamide, marijuana, methamphetamine, opium,
phencyclidine, and barbituric acid, including
phenobarbital and secobarbital. “Controlled
substance” also means any substance that is included
in Schedules I through V established by the Controlled
Substances Act of 1970 (21 U.S.C. § 812).
An accused who consciously avoids knowledge of the presence of a controlled substance or the contraband nature of the substance is subject to the same criminal liability as
one who has actual knowledge.
Use” means to inject, ingest, inhale, or otherwise introduce into the human body, any controlled substance. Knowledge of the presence of the controlled substance is a required component of use. Knowledge of the presence of the controlled substance may be inferred from the presence of the controlled substance in the accused’s body or from other circumstantial evidence. This permissive inference may be legally sufficient to satisfy the Government’s burden of proof as to knowledge.
CASE RESULTS DEPEND UPON A VARIETY OF FACTORS UNIQUE TO EACH DISCHARGE CASE; PRIOR CASE RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE OR PREDICT A SIMILAR RESULT IN ANY FUTURE CASE UNDERTAKEN BY THE LAWYER.
An officer tested positive for MDMA, Cocaine and Ecstasy. The officer received a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand and was recommended for elimination. Developed very powerful and compelling evidence in rebuttal, mitigation and extenuation. After approximately 2 hours of deliberations, the elimination board recommended to retain the officer.
Naval Discharge Review Board decision docket number MD21-00680. Service member received Article 15 UCMJ for violating Article 112a UCMJ, summary court martial, and additional punishment for a DUI. Service member was discharged with an other than honorable characterization of service. Represented Client during the paper submission and a hearing. The Naval Discharge Review Board decided to upgrade the characterization of service go general under honorable conditions and change the narrative reason for separation to ‘Secretarial Authority’
ROTC Cadet tested positive for illegal substance abuse. Carefully analyzed all facts and circumstances relating to the Article 112a UCMJ elements and developed evidence in rebuttal, mitigation, and extenuation. Result: Cadet was retained but later experienced security clearance issues
Service member separated with an other than honorable characterization of service for drug use. Analyzed all evidence and recommended to file a lawsuit. Result: Client’s characterization of service was changed to ‘honorable’ and re-entry code to ‘RE1’, narrative reason for separation did not indicate any misconduct.
Naval Discharge Review Board decision docket number ND23-6323. Service member was separated from active duty for substance abuse with a general discharge. Service member petitioned the Naval Discharge Review Board to upgrade his discharge. Carefully analyzed all evidence and discovered that in addition to insufficient evidence there were due process violations. The Naval Discharge Review Board upgraded the characterization of discharge to honorable, RE1 and changed the narrative reason for separation
1629 K Street Northwest, Washington, District of Columbia 20006, United States
Mon | 09:00 am – 05:00 pm | |
Tue | 09:00 am – 05:00 pm | |
Wed | 09:00 am – 05:00 pm | |
Thu | 09:00 am – 05:00 pm | |
Fri | 09:00 am – 05:00 pm | |
Sat | Closed | |
Sun | Closed |
Superb attorney with amazing legal talent
Mr. Kornacki is an incredibly talented attorney - bar none!
Excellent Job
Wojciech Kornacki is an outstanding and strong advocate for his clients. To the counter party, he is super tough and strong. To his clients, he is very patient and very pleasant to work with.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.